Independent cybersecurity news and intelligence
HomeSourcesRSS
Cybersecurity News. Source-grounded Intelligence.
Back to newsroom
VulnerabilitiesCyberDeltaForce Newsroom

JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions Vulnerability Tracked as CVE-2026-42016

A security weakness in JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) is being tracked as CVE-2026-42016.

NIST NVDSep 12, 2026, 4:16 AM UTC3 min readCVE-2026-42016
IN 30 SECONDS

The news in brief

What happenedSource reporting

A security weakness in JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) is being tracked as CVE-2026-42016.

Who or what is affectedSource reporting

JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions before 7 133 11 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack due to a validation check of the token signature/issuer and not the token’s scope.

Why leaders should careSource reporting

The important point is that running an affected version of JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) creates exposure, while an actual compromise still depends on whether the attacker can reach the trigger conditions described above.

What security teams should doCDF guidance

Inventory the affected product deployments and confirm whether the affected component and vulnerable release are present.

THE NEWS

What happened

Verified reporting in clear, practical language.

A security weakness in JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) is being tracked as CVE-2026-42016. JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions before 7 133 11 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack due to a validation check of the token signature/issuer and not the token’s scope.

The important point is that running an affected version of JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) creates exposure, while an actual compromise still depends on whether the attacker can reach the trigger conditions described above. The disclosed vulnerability affects JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted), and organizations should first determine whether that technology exists in their environment.

Remediation validation should confirm that the vulnerable JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) path no longer accepts the reported unsafe condition after the fix or mitigation is applied.

REFERENCES

Reference sources

CYBERDELTAFORCE INTELLIGENCE

Reporting ends here. The sections below are CyberDeltaForce analysis and defender-focused interpretation.

DEFENDER ACTIONS

What security teams should do now

  • Inventory the affected product deployments and confirm whether the affected component and vulnerable release are present.
  • Apply the vendor patch or mitigation for CVE-2026-42016 and validate the affected path after remediation.
OPEN QUESTIONS

What is not yet confirmed

  • So far, researchers have not reported exploitation, but that can change as vendor, government or threat-intelligence reporting develops.
Continue the story

Related Cybersecurity Coverage

More cybersecurity news
CyberDeltaForce publication standards